Trump faces a spate of investigations beyond the January 6 investigation – archyde

As Donald Trump’s attorneys try to prevent the White House from releasing records to the Congressional Committee investigating the January 6th Capitol Rising, the former president faces a spate of further investigations over the coming weeks and into the new year could come to a climax.

That includes two major state criminal investigations – one in New York and one in Georgia – as well as sexual assault charges, an inheritance dispute, and whether he should be personally held responsible for inciting the riot.

Trump has long dismissed the investigation as a politically motivated witch hunt, which he believes began with an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. But while he has spent most of his life avoiding legal ramifications, he is no longer protected by the indictment protection that incumbent presidents enjoy.

And any charge – which would be the first against a former US president – could affect both his business and his political prospects as he considers running for a second term.

Here’s the latest on the state of the art:

New York

New York prosecutors investigating the former president’s business dealings recently convened a new grand jury to hear evidence after the previous panel’s term expired.

Manhattan prosecutors are considering further charges in the case, which led to tax fraud charges against Trump’s company, the Trump Organization, and its longtime CFO Allen Weisselberg in July. They are accused of defrauding the tax authorities through lucrative, untaxed fringe benefits.

Weißelberg is on trial again in July.

Against Trump himself, according to Dist. Atty. Cyrus Vance Jr., who is leaving office later this year, fought for years to gain access to the former president’s tax records. The prosecution is also considering charges against the company’s chief operating officer, Matthew Calamari Sr.

Investigators working for Vance and New York Atty. General Letitia James has spent more than two years investigating whether the Trump organization is misleading banks or tax officials about the value of their assets, inflating them to get cheap loan terms, or minimizing them for tax savings.

“I think it’s pretty clear that our investigation is active and ongoing,” Vance said on Tuesday.

In addition to his involvement in Vance’s criminal investigation, James’ office is also conducting its own civil investigation.

Regardless, Trump is facing a review of his real estate in the suburbs of New York City.

Westchester County Dist. Atty. Mimi E. Rocah cited files from the city of Ossining when she was investigating whether Trump’s company tricked officials into lowering taxes on a golf course there The Reason.


Get our Essential Politics newsletter

The latest news, analysis, and insights from our policy teams from Sacramento to DC

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.


Located in Atlanta, Fulton County Dist. Atty. Fani Willis opened an investigation in January into possible attempts to meddle in the administration of the 2020 state election, which Trump narrowly lost.

Willis sent letters to top elected officials in February – including Governor Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger – instructing them to keep all election-related records, especially those that might contain evidence of attempts to influence election officials.

Evidence includes a Jan. 2 phone conversation between Trump and Raffensperger in which Trump repeatedly and falsely alleged that Raffensperger, a Republican, could alter the state’s certified election results, which showed Trump’s Democratic challenger Joe Biden won the state. A recording of the call was obtained the next day from news organizations including the AP.

“I only want to find 11,780 votes, that’s one more than us,” said Trump. “Because we won the state.”

Willis was silent about the investigation, but her office has confirmed that it is still ongoing.

“All available evidence will be analyzed, whether it was collected by this office, another investigative agency, or published by the witnesses themselves. A decision as to whether a criminal charge is warranted against an individual will be made when that process is complete, ”spokesman Jeff DiSantis said in an email.

One of the sources Willis’ team is sure to investigate is a book by Raffensperger that was published November 2nd.

It includes a transcript of the January 2 call, annotated with the Foreign Minister’s observations, including his view that the President threatened him in several places.

Willis said earlier this year that she was also interested in the circumstances surrounding Byung J. “BJay” Pak’s sudden resignation as a US attorney in Atlanta on January 4th.

Pak told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he originally planned to stay in office until the day of inauguration on Jan. 20, but that he resigned weeks earlier under pressure from Trump.

Washington, D.C

District of Columbia attorney general Karl Racine said earlier this year that district attorneys are investigating Trump’s role in the January 6 riot and are considering indicting him under a local law criminalizing statements motivating people to engage in violence.

However, there was no evidence to suggest that such charges are likely. If Trump were indicted, it would be a minor offense with a maximum sentence of six months in prison.


In addition to the ongoing criminal investigation, Trump faces a number of civil lawsuits, including despised business investors, his estranged niece, and Democratic lawmakers and Capitol police officers accusing him of instigating the Jan. 6 violence.

These include a lawsuit brought by the Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Bennie Thompson, of Mississippi, under the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act, which prohibits violence or intimidation to prevent officials from performing their constitutional duties.

In October, Trump was questioned under oath behind closed doors on a statement about a lawsuit by protesters who alleged his security team attacked them outside Trump Tower in the early days of his 2015 presidential campaign.

Trump also faces a defamation case from columnist E. Jean Carroll, who says Trump raped her in a locker room in an upscale Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. Trump has said that Carroll is “completely lying” and that she is “not my type”.

Attorneys for the US Department of Justice argued earlier this year that Trump could not be held personally liable for “crude and disrespectful” statements made about a woman who accused him of rape for making those statements during his tenure. The U.S. District Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on Friday.

Trump had faced a similar defamation lawsuit from Summer Zervos, a former contestant on his reality TV show “The Apprentice” who accused Trump of kissing and groping her against her will in 2007 – but she left the lawsuit unexpected last month fall.

Regardless, Trump’s estranged niece, Mary Trump, has sued him and other family members on charges of defrauding them of millions of dollars in inheritance funds.

Trump has filed his own lawsuit against Mary Trump and the New York Times over a 2018 story about his family’s finances, based in part on confidential documents she provided to the newspaper. He accuses her of violating a settlement agreement that prohibited her from disclosing the documents.

Mary Trump’s lawyers filed papers Thursday to dismiss her uncle’s lawsuit against her.

Brumback reported from Atlanta. Associate press writers Bernard Condon in New York and Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *